Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Card Combo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Seven Card Combo was created Ohio in 2005". It also only has seven Google hits. Something somebody made up, not a well-known game. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Just not a notable enough card game as yet. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 21:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Looks like something made up in school. —dustmite 21:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• It is popular though. If only in the area. It is somthing people might look up in wikipedia for info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scmcverry (talk • contribs)
  • ...and he's the *gasp!* creator of the article! Possible vanity. Seven Ghit Combo = delete vote courtesy of Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) at 21:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment If you can produce some independent sources to verify that, I'd be happy to change my stance. —dustmite 21:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Maybe not, he's the creator of said article. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 21:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Geez, if it will prevent you from sleep at night. I guess I am new to editing wikipedia but I don't really understand the problem of there being an article on this game. If people only wanted to learn about nationwide popular stuff i dont see why wikipedia even exists! Isn't the point of a wiki that people can share more unique information and ideas? Mainstream stuff doesn't need individuals, it is the small things that need the smal people. and i think wikipedia is for the small people — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scmcverry (talk • contribs) Please sign all your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
  • Wikipedia exists as an encyclopedic reference, and verifiability is requisite for inclusion of a subject. Otherwise there would be no way to regulate the site. This game would be a reasonable candidate for inclusion if you can prove that it really is popular, at least locally. —dustmite 22:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia is not a social experiment nor a soapbox for "small people". It is an encyclopaedia. Uncle G 22:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.