Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventysomething (term)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seventysomething (term) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Per this policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary Bit Lordy (talk) 09:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That's a tough one because others (Twentysomething (term) and Thirtysomething (term)) have been created with no issues. But I agree with Bit Lordy this isn't a dictionary. »xytram« talk 09:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite the other articles, this one doesn't have the same context and relevance, and as stated above, this ain't a dictionary. WikiKingOfMishawaka (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; that is what Wikitionary is for. Happyme22 (talk) 23:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I would have said WP:NEO, rather than WP:DICT. I can't find any evidence of use. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.