Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sextant Properties (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and salt. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sextant Properties

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PR article for a company that is not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, as the article creator is Matcany and the ceo of this company is Matthieu Cany it may be a case of WP:PROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted before, should be deleted again for the same reason. Delete and salt - David Gerard (talk) 08:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete and salt blatant advertising and COI concerns. LibStar (talk) 12:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly advertising. Salt too. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.