Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual Passivity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to incubator. Largely OR - as pointed out, needs expert treatment Black Kite 11:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual Passivity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research essay, is attemtping to argue a point. Zazaban (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but needs help from an expert. Covered in scholarly articles unrelated to BDSM here, here, and here to name a few plus in many texts [1]. J04n(talk page) 13:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - expert required, as wll as the counter-article sexual aggression since it is referred to so much in WP [2]. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 17:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but rewrite as NPOV. The beginning sentence "Every article on sexual humiliation and passivity has been written from a BDSM angle." has got to go. Wikipedia articles do not criticise Wikipedia itself or other sources. JIP | Talk 17:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Incubate. I think this is a good candidate for the Wikipedia:Article Incubator, a new project to allow articles at risk of deletion to be worked on outside articlespace. The topic is valid, but the current content is appalling and will need time, effort and expertise to get it up to an acceptable standard. If editors agree, the closing admin can move the article to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Sexual passivity. Fences&Windows 19:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Incubate. Per above. Zazaban (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or incubate. This family of articles really needs to do a better job of explaining that dominance/submission, top/bottom, and aggression/passivity are independent axes. Guy Baldwin also needs to go blue. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.