Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sh-

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It may be slang, or it may be a joke, but it's not encyclopedic. BrainyBroad 03:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this sharticle as non-encyclopedic. -- DS1953 ^talk 04:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Dxco 05:37, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Shdelete. -- Captain Disdain 06:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree. may be true somewhere, but does not specify --jnothman ^talk 08:54, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  Southern UK - the reference to Birmingham makes that clear enough. I remember this as a pretty brief fad in the late 90s, though I always thought it was a Yiddish reference and spelt "sch-". — Haeleth Talk

• Redirect without merging to Shibboleth --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 17:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete schdicdef of obsolete schlang. — Haeleth Talk 18:32, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unencyclopedic. -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} ^<Contribs> 09:40, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. Garr 00:08, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as stated. zellin t / c 04:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.