- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A slang interjection. I doubt even Wiktionary want it, although they do have similar articles like aarrgh, rowrbazzle and shazbot Dangherous 21:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak transwiki or delete. I think it might be good enough for wiktionary (it is used, but it's really just "sure",) definitely not for here. Would never be more than a dicdef. Grandmasterka 06:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Mailer Diablo 15:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mailer Diablo 15:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I seriously doubt Wiktionary wants it. --Eivindt@c 00:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it doesn't even have a known spelling. --Ajdz 05:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.