Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabaam Sahdeeq rapper
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Shabaam Sahdeeq rapper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and badly written promotional piece about a non-notable subject (no third-party articles on Google). sixtynine • spill it • 07:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails WP:BAND.Armbrust (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean up. I remember this guy from the Polyrhythm Addicts, and from his appearances on the early Rawkus Records stuff. There's an album review at Allmusic and a live review at Rolling Stone - that's enough to just about scrape WP:MUSIC for me. sparkl!sm hey! 14:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep agree with sparkl, the Rolling Stone and Allmusic reviews are enough for WP:GNG. Incorporating the info into the article. J04n(talk page) 00:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- note: the above mentioned references have been added to the article, as well as a few more (the additional one aren't enough to establish WP:N, but do collaborate items in the article), also neutralized the POV and removed some unsourced WP:BLP issues that I couldn't find refs for. J04n(talk page) 01:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Reliable sourced were added, thus it met WP:BAND. Armbrust (talk) 11:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.