Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabash (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  22:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and Shabash Merops. This was nominated for deletion and withdrawn without much discussion. User:Stifle said that "The software does not seem to be notable independent of its company." I'm not sure that the software is notable either. They might have some impressive clients but that doesn't automatically confer notability. A Google search for their "flagship product" descends into random spam words before one results page is through (i.e. less than 10 valid results). With quotes, the sole result is from us. I'm relisting to generate debate and, pending any evidence of notability, I say Delete. kingboyk 01:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nn company. dbtfz^talk 01:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, non-notable company --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CORP and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --AaronS 22:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn, though not the usual straight advertising. Staxringold 22:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-08 02:18Z
• Comment: With now over 1 million articles on Wikipedia, surely the threshold of notability is lowering, meaning people are increasingly able to find information on increasingly obscure subjects. Can I ask what you would consider 'evidence of notability?'. Shabash's list of clients may not make the company relevent to the masses, but they make them relevent within the field of publishing and XML mark-up. - Joe —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.134.95.4 (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.