Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabnam Sayed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shabnam Sayed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shabnam Sayed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Lack of reliable significant resources. Fails WP:GNG CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nothing to show multiple significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not having significant roles on multiple projects to pass WP:NACTOR - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because the nomination is by a blocked sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Spiderone 20:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NACTOR, WP:BIO and WP:GNG. The subject is pretty non notable despite nomination from a blocked sock. I am surprised it was accepted at NPP and survived for nearly 7 years here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roller26 (talk • contribs)
• Delete There is nothing substantial in the article and I couldn't find either doing a google search. Fails the relevant SNG criteria. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 20:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.