- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Shamsullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual except for one event. Limited if any third-party (non-U.S. government) mention. Grsz11 15:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, nominator appears to have selected 5-6 random Guantanamo detainees to try and delete, copy/pasting his nomination for each of them. Third-Party sources seem to exist for all of them, and no attempt is being made to improve or expand the articles, instead just jumping straight to deletion. AfD is not the proper route to ensure an article is fixed up - though it sometimes has that effect. This article needs work, yes - but it is about a notable individual andadequately sourced with reliable footnotes. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 17:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As for the others. sources are adequate. Most of the gitmo prisoners are notable in at least two phases of their life: their role in their fighting, and their role as a prisoner. DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. Per above keeps.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.