Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanghai Mini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghai Mini

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shanghai Mini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Very little content with a lack of sources required to provide notability. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found one review [1]. Not seeing anything else. Timur9008 (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Reviews by IGN: [2] and Pocket Gamer magazine: [3]. Borderline notable game, 3 reviews, 2 on the shorter side but I think it's just enough for notability. --Mika1h (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per demonstrated reviews, it clearly does not fail the GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There appears to be enough coverage in reliable sources, but I'm relisting this anyways to hear feedback from more users
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The reviews are enough to pass GNG. ScalarFactor (talk) 02:40, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this basically comes down to: do three small reviews constitute notability? I say yes

Czarking0 (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.