- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to I Came Upon a Lighthouse. Please note that the target, I Came Upon a Lighthouse, is also currently nominated for deletion. Participants here are encouraged to voice their opinion on it as well. Owen× ☎ 07:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shantanu Naidu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to establish notability independent of his association with Ratan Tata, per WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, WP:BIO, and WP:INHERITED.
His startups do not meet WP:NCORP due to modest scale and event-specific reporting, and the book lacks significant critical reviews or awards to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Zuck28 (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. Zuck28 (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
:@Zuck28, Before taking any abrupt or random action, always ensure proper research is done and all sources are thoroughly verified. Acting without accurate information can lead to serious consequences and misunderstandings. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC) yet another sock block. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep You can see numerous siginificant coverage on reliable sources like this: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and there are many more in line. Easily passes WP:GNG. CresiaBilli (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Most of these sources are about a Linkedin post he made. Two have no bylines. Toadspike [Talk] 05:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- @CresiaBilli:, I would ask that you respond the to the AfD issues on your talk page. Since you have not, pinging you here. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep Pass WP:GNG.Sync! (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2025 (UTC)(
Blocked sockpuppet) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Given the sources provided above I think that notability is met here. I think it would be wise to integrate those sources into the article so that we don't have to argue this again. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Those sources are not in-depth or significant. Zuck28 (talk) 23:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to I Came Upon a Lighthouse per WP:ATD. The page doesn’t have much going for it content-wise or in terms of notability. "General manager, head of strategic initiatives wing" fails to clear the WP:NBUSINESSPERSON bar. Yuvaank (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Paid-for articles and churnalism that fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA is not what can be used for notability. The attempting gaming of the AfD process tells me this is also UPE and would recommend salting or we will be right back here again. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:29, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: based on what the nom and others have put forward. Redirecting it to 'I Came Upon a Lighthouse', is fine too. Charlie (talk) 06:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. The book is also up for deletion and is extremely unlikely to pass AfD. If this article fails at AfD, this could probably redirect to the in popular culture section of Tata's article - I've added a couple of sentences there. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.