- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 22:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article is a hoax, or at the very least non-notable. No references of it can be found through googling. Whpq 01:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Fabricationary 01:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not for something that you make up at the bar one day. -- Mikeblas 02:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsensecruft --Xrblsnggt 03:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia's not for beer instructions... Michael 07:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax/advertisement. "Its emphasis of refining an already superior taste"? One might almost suspect this of having been written by the Corona publicity department. Maybe it's a transcript of some new campaign. — Haeleth Talk 19:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Kinu t/c 04:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Most likely a hoax/ad. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.