This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedied. Grue 17:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-encyclopaedic, probably name-vanity. --fvw* 17:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I speedied different entry entitled Sharonie earlier today. Can this be speedied too even though the content is different? CLW 17:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That was my first thought, but this is a different article that happens to have the same name. IMO the content isn't useful, but I don't see an obvious way to speedy it. Nontheless, delete. Friday (talk) 17:27, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I reckon it can be speedied - I view creating a daft article to replace a speedied article is vandalism; also the article contains no useful information and includes nonsense ("Ja" is not a short form of "Sharonie"). We'll see if that works... CLW 18:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.