- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. DS 01:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. Reads like a product review. Jnk 02:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV review of a mobile phone; no claims to notability of said phone. Unencyclopædic in tone, scope and content of article. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I agree with User:(aeropagitica), also note that the article is written in first-person voice. JIP | Talk 09:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 11:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 12:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 17:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Poorly-written article about unremarkable phone. Delete it. -- Krash (Talk) 14:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.