- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nn vanity piece, assertions of notability are dubious Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - assertion of notability seems to be that they were really good as a cover band. No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Note that there are other bands with the same name. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ChetblongT C 01:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just a hair away from being A7 material, but nonetheless this is not a notable band. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.