- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Absence of sources prevent this from ever being more than a dictionary definition. Tom Harrison Talk 18:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unverifiable, and not notable in any case. ... discospinster talk 18:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as something made up in school one day and redirect to that webcomic that the article metions. BigDT 18:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Darn; I should have just redirected. Tom Harrison Talk 18:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's probably not a bad idea to have the AFD ... just in case someone is able to produce evidence of notability. Occasionally, someone will find something that has been missed. BigDT 20:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Darn; I should have just redirected. Tom Harrison Talk 18:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete inherently unverifiable stub. KillerChihuahua?!? 21:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless some reliable sources are provided. Ziggurat 22:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as NN; only nine mentions between 1935 and 2005 in the Torch and Wittenberg Magazine (search here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.