- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shit Hop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A google search reveals no news sources use this term. Only non-notable music artists are alleged to use this term to describe their music. —Ute in DC (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOTMADEUP. I was just PRODing this when you took it to AfD. I can't find anything approaching a reliable source for this and there are significant NPOV concerns with phrases like "which in turn caused the outcome of the songs, combined with the questionable talent of the rappers, to be quite shit."
- Delete "Significant NPOV concerns"-- oh, ya think? But not bad as WP:NOTMADEUP transgressions go, I have to admit. Is there a gallery for MADEUP somewhere on WP? This really should be preserved somewhere. Yakushima (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This was bugging me so I went back and removed the most blatant NPOV concerns from the "origins" section. AfD participants looking to evaluate this article in all its glory are welcome to consult the history, though the phrase I quoted above gives a general sense. Zachlipton (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think the author has a sense of humor (and this could easily be integrated in to a movie like Naked Gun). Obviously there are lots of hits on Google but the general gist appears to be that what has been described as a genre is just terminology used to describe poor quality Hip Hop in a derogatory way. It is possible that a genre has blossomed out of this derogatory terminology but is there anybody out there who is prepared to admit that is their genre (and back it up). Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 20:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. -Cntras (talk) 11:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nipsonanomhmata but possibly pickle it somewhere. Reminded me of a former colleague (a skinhead bovver boy who was into classical and baroque chamber music) who one day asked why the C was always silent in 'rap'. Peridon (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously a clear WP:NOTMADEUP candidate. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOTMADEUP. --Bobbyd2011 (talk) 15:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOTMADEUP. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.