- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Bong. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 02:25Z
Wikipedia is not censored, however, does Shottie really need its own article? By the articles own admission, it is a variation of the Bong and has no sources to show its notability RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, simply being a variation of something else is not a reason for deletion. However the article appears to completely break Wikipedia:No original research. Mathmo Talk 10:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Where are the references? YechielMan 22:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of reliable sources. If this is a common slang term, then redirect to Bong but I see nothing here that would warrant merging. (jarbarf) 16:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.