Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shouldn't Have Done That

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to A Broken Frame. Opabinia regalis (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Have Done That

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG and is unlikely to ever be more than a stub. Not every recorded track meets the NSONG criteria for notability Flat Out (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

Note: Other AfDs for similar articles made under the same circumstances exist. Here is the list so far:

--DanielRigal (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to A Broken Frame. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Redirect Flat Out (talk) 00:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Redirects are cheap, so redirecting to the album is possible, but a redirect is likely useless, too, in a case like this. Nothing is gained by keeping (there isn't unique information), and the song is not notable. (Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands, it ain't.) Hithladaeus (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.