- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is purely speculative, therefore failing WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a cystal ball. It also fails WP:RS, as it has no sources at all. Finally, it is a non-notable subject. I couldn't find information about it on a Google search, since Nike now have created ShoX technology, therefore failing WP:N, as no non-trivial works have been published about it. 0L1 Talk Contribs 15:03 17/12/2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. Just like to add that it was me who originally created the article when I was relatively inexperienced and wasn't familiar with Wikipedia notability policies, but now I realise that it doesn't deserve an article. 0L1 Talk Contribs 15:07 17/12/2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:OR and WP:V. -- Satori Son 21:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced crystal balling. —ShadowHalo 22:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Eon8-esque crystalballism. Danny Lilithborne 00:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.