- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Proto///type 12:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page is for a new word that has not yet gained wide spread acceptance and is not yet worthy of an entry RicDod 17:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neo. Only use of the word I know involves involves Roger the Shrubber. Term isn't even used in the cited external link. Fan1967 18:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Ifnord 19:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Danny Lilithborne 20:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 21:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I think a previous page had this name and related to jumping onto shrubs (bushing maybe) - neologism in any case. Jammo (SM247) 00:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but Wiktionary is. I think that Wiktionary is the place for neologisms like this. Jesse Viviano 01:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NEO We don't do homages. No point transwikying if (as it appears) it's a made-up definition with one current user. --DaveG12345 10:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.