Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siberian artificial language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 10:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian artificial language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A thorough original research on a new artificial language . The provided references, with the exception of author's are nothing but newspaper references. Not a single linguistic, i.e., peer reference. the whole content fails verifiabilty criteria. Mukadderat 22:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as insufficiently notable. Although linguistic journals would be best, citations from high-profile newspapers would do to demonstrate notability. But the non-Volgota references are largely blogs, and press agencies aren't sufficiently discriminate about what they put out to be viewed as reliable third-party sources. Tearlach 22:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tearlach. Edison 04:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.