- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 03:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Siddharth JAIN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promo article with non-notable references which mention the person concerned, but are not directly about him. Biker Biker (talk) 11:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 02:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. promotional article. all newspaper coverage cited is about the company's activities and not about the subject--Sodabottle (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep & Expand. Subject is quoted / interviewed in all the articles and hence must be of some importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.234.33 (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He's a marketing chap with a company, so obviously he's going to be quoted in context (which is what these "interviews" are - single line quotes), nothing else. Nothing about him anywhere. There are quite a few other people with the same name who appear to be notable. So, not going to pass WP:BIO. -SpacemanSpiff 20:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability. As indicated above, the alleged "interviews" are actually press release-type articles that do not count as WP:RS. --Kinu t/c 22:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.