- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SideStep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not feel this article passes WP:ORG. The fact that it has zero references and pushes the promotional boundaries doesn't help. 132 05:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] show that SideStep is notable per WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Andrea105. Joe Chill (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.