Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidney Stringer School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep: nomination withdrawn. Silensor 04:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is subject to constant vandalism. It has been marked for cleanup since June with no improvement. Also, may not meet WP:SCHOOL guidelines. SquidSK ^(1MC--log) 08:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC) Keep Withdraw nom due to significant cleanup and expansion in the last 24 hours. SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 03:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• It truly was rubbish, and a prime example of the semi-libellous non-article, full of things that happened in school one day and no real information, that school articles written solely by pupils all-too-often become, at the time of nomination. That could have been deleted with no loss to the encyclopaedia. It has, however, since been entirely rewritten. That this school satisfies the WP:SCHOOL criteria is demonstrated by the references section of the article itself, as rewritten. Keep. Uncle G 12:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — Looks good now. I don't believe vandalism is a suitable justification for deletion. — RJH (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since the article looks good now with multiple references, plus vandalism alone is never a reason for deletion. Yamaguchi先生 03:16, 30 September 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.