Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siebert Neethling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siebert Neethling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes a number of claims, but a search for coverage in reliable sources only resulted in brief mentions, promotional material, or professional sites. The only sources in the article are not independent of the subject. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probable autobio. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete created by a single purpose editor. reeks of self promotion. LibStar (talk) 06:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to a new start again in-line IRSSed and non PROMO article. Aoziwe (talk) 12:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.