Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Chittor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Chittor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This conflict has not more than 2-3 lines of passing mentions in sources, now of which refer to it by the name it is titled as. The WP:SIGCOV is clearly lacking and therefore this should be deleted, the important bits can be covered at Rana Raimal's article if not done already. CharlesWain (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article fails in many aspects such as notability which could not even affirm the chosen title by the creator. The siege is insignificant and doesn't look like sources are ready to talk about this. Although I'm open for a merge with Rana Raimal given whatever conflict has occurred. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 11:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails significant coverage Hionsa (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing notable about this battle. Agletarang (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.