Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sight transposition
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus, leaning towards merge. - Mailer Diablo 16:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
dictdef, and very bare one at that. Tagged as a speedy, but IMO does not qualify. Delete unl;ess expanded to a decent stub at least. DES (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable topic, potential for expansion. Kappa 03:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge dicdef with Transposition (music) (where the explanations for Diatonic transposition & Transpositional equivalency already reside) --anetode¹ ² ³ 03:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it's likely that this page stems from a discussion on Clef which used to contain extensive information on the use of archaic C-clefs for sight transposition, a technique commonly taught in Europe. The weight of that info was too much for Clef, and the last person to edit it took much of it out but left a redlink for Sight transposition where it could later be re-introduced. So it has substantial potential for more than a dicdef. There probably is room for it on Transposition (music), however. —Wahoofive (talk) 04:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Transposition (music). Gazpacho 04:26, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Transposition (music). Jacqui ★ 05:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: considerable potential for expansion. - Squibix 16:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.