- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The recent !votes trend keep and since there are additional references added to the talk page that confer notability of the discussion, I believe that satisfies the concerns of the nominators and of those originally !voting delete. (non-admin closure) Go Phightins! 01:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sigma Thêta Pi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just a student fraternity. No attempt made to provide evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. I'd still speedy the article as A7, personally, and just put it out of its misery that way. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability under WP:GNG. Fails all alternate notability provisions in WP:ORG, as well.--GrapedApe (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable sources. North8000 (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional possible References added to Talk:Sigma Thêta Pi Naraht (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sigma Theta Pi is a young fraterntiy. It is expected that the number of sources is limited. The existing ones (on the page and in the talk section) prove that the fraternity exists and is active on different campuses. I agree that the wikipedia page lacks some information, but i'm confident it will be fixed in a near future since the fraternity is rapidly growing. Kheiron_STP (Talk) 13:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC) — Precedingunsigned comment added by86.68.100.172 (talk)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional references added to the talk page by Kheiron STP.Naraht (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This article is in need of expansion not deletion.Drdpw (talk) 02:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if expanded as Drdpw has said above. Some of the references added in thalkpage of the article look good! --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.