Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigrid D. Peyerimhoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-26 12:39Z

Sigrid D. Peyerimhoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article has been tagged to be cleaned up since August 2005, but hasn't been done so. Since it hasn't been cleaned by the editor I suggest the article to be deleted. --Pinkkeith 19:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - seems to be notable in her field. 26k+ ghits.Bakaman 19:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. This article may need some cleanup, but it is in reasonable shape. The idea of deleting it is quite unacceptable. She is a member of the select International Academy of Quantum Molecular Science which makes her extremely notable in her field. I am trying to add articles for all members of that academy. I will try to improve it. --Bduke 20:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up the article, removed some direct copy from her biography and added several references particularly to her publications. I removed two external links that were just to single papers (out of around 500) and added more general external links. --Bduke 21:52, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, as per User:Bakasuprman. Ford MF 21:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, an old cleanup tag should never be reason for deletion. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 22:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - cleanup means cleanup, and does not mean delete. -- Whpq 23:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep appears to be notable and verifiable enough for an article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.