Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silent Explosion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that this should not exist as its own article. I will thus delete it, but am willing to userfy it on request if someone wishes to discuss the merits of a merge. If a merge it proposed, further discussion should take place on the destination article's talk page. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Explosion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same as previous prod "Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of inheritance through founding band." Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with White Zombie; subject does not have enough merit for its own article, however, it is worth noting on the band's page. Donatrip (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge A short-live record label that published a few indie albums isn't notable enough for its own article, but may warrant merging into an article about independent record labels, or the White Zombie article. I have absolutely no objection to merge. DOSGuy (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I would have agreed with the merge but what content would we merge? We could add the content to the "early years" section but I'm concerned with the lack of third-party sources. I have found zero reliable third-party sources to establish notability aside from one Google Books result which was published with Wikipedia content thus unreferenced. It is not surprising that there would've been little to no coverage, considering that the group was the only artist. SwisterTwister talk 23:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.