Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. I'm unable to find any independent coverage whatsoever. SmartSE (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also adding the founder of the organisation. SmartSE (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Benton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both -- Sources do not establish notability for either subject. Parts of walled garden created by Special:Contributions/Brianfbenton: likely promotionalism & COI editing. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: sources are sparse and unreliable. DrStrauss talk please use {{ping|DrStrauss}} when replying 11:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.