This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 17:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a proper Wikipedia article: instead somebody apparently just copy-pasted a tidbit of information, which now appears in the encyclopedia without any context, and which merely serves to advertise the embedded hyperlink. --Maikel 15:13, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- ... plus, even the title is grammatically incorrect (missing hyphen)! --Maikel 15:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a direct copy from the website rferenced in it, and i have tagged it as a copyvio. If it is released, or rewitten not to violate copyright, a check should be made to see if this "message" has any widespread notability. if it does it should be kept, otherwise it should be deleted. DES (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- this site seems to suggest that this subject may be notable enough for an article. If kept, should be moved to Silo's message. DES (talk) 18:07, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't question that Siloism merits an article, but that the existing article is an adequate Wikipedia article. --Maikel 09:34, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- this site seems to suggest that this subject may be notable enough for an article. If kept, should be moved to Silo's message. DES (talk) 18:07, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wait until someone writes a proper article which would go on Silo_(mystic) or Siloism. We would not even need this as a redirect. -- RHaworth 22:43, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it and forget about it. If there's any notability in this supposed "message", this article entirely fails to communicate it. TheMadBaron 02:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.