Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Battle discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Simone Battle. MBisanz ^talk 21:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Battle discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What a hoax, nothing has charted and most of the singles are Youtube videos! JayJay^{Talk to me} 21:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because it's likely that the same rationale use to delete the discography article can be used to delete the parent article: Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Delete per nom. There is no indication of notability. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Simone Battle article. I tidied the article to remove the unsupported text. The combination of X Factor, television and film work, and membership of the Pussycat Dolls should be enough for the article's retention. GFHandel ♬ 20:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking back at my bundling, I think that I may have been hasty. Nice work! I withdraw my nomination for the Simone Battle aticle only. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree with 'hoax'... Simone Battle was a finalist on the X Factor (USA) and a current member of The Pussycat Dolls. Not to say notability is inherent, but hardly a hoax. Secondly, the article is about her discography and seeming meets WP:NALBUM (singles inclusive in this policy as WP:GNG). I would also like to point out that songs/albums/singles do not need to chart to warrant a standalone article. They merely need to be GNG. I would be opposed to this if each song/single had its own article per WP:NSONG but this article is about the entire discography of a well known artist. This would be the article in which all information about her singles/songs would be merged into. Mkdw ^talk 23:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
merge there is not enough content to support a separate discography. "ten YouTube videos, four singles and one music video." can be handled perfectly well in the main section. DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Simone Battle. A lot of the info in the article lead, about her TV appearances etc, doesn't belong in a discography article, and should go in the main article. Certainly after merging/removing that, there's no need for a separate discography article of this short length. --Colapeninsula (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the sourced text into the Simone Battle article as needed. The chart boxes (with the exception of the "He Likes Boys" single) are mostly unnecessary as merely representing cover songs performed on her YouTube channel. Gong show 19:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.