Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simons Architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simons Architects

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flagged for significant work since 2022, and for COI and Paid contributions, the article is WP:ADMASQ for a small firm of architects which seems to be seeking to inherit notability from its clients, but fails WP:NCORP. WP:BOMBARD and WP:CITEKILL are almost invariably key indicators of puffery. This is no exception to that. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Business, Companies, and Maine. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The Refboming is horrible. The sources mention their projects or are mainly routine coverage. I could not find anything meeting WP:CORPDEPTH but happy to revisit should someone call out the sources that do.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Firm appears to have a substantial body work for which they have received numerous awards. As Wikipedia:CONRED says If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD.]] As suggested in Wikipedia:Using deletion as cleanup, this may be an opportunity to do that. Djflem (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to clean up the page should there be sources showing notability. Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT. Are you able to supply a few to review? --CNMall41 (talk) 19:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with CNMall41 on ref bombing. Drushrush (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP and as written, WP:PROMO. SportingFlyer T·C 19:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Scott Simons was created by the same SPA, I wonder if that is also a candidate for deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 19:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Simons. Thank you for noticing it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.