Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple future tense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Future tense. – Alphax ^τεχ 10:43, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply a brief French grammar lesson, which is covered in more detail at Wikibooks. Also, we already have the French verbs and Morphology of the French verb articles.

• Delete. Andrew Levine 00:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, can be expanded to cover English simple future tense, Persian simple future tense, Russian simple future tense etc. Kappa 01:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Wikibooks anyone?—Gaff ^ταλκ 01:58, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redundant.Voice of All ^{@|Esperanza|E M} 03:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Future tense. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 10:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikibooks. Neier 11:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• We will delete (simple future). We will be redirecting to Future tense (that's future continuous). After that, we will have deleted (future perfect, IIRC). Grutness...wha? 11:36, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless someone wants to convert it into an article on simple future tense in general, i.e. on the tense itself in different languages, how it relates to other tenses, which languages lack such a tense etc. (And by convert, I mean "write from scratch".) Rd232 ^talk 12:08, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Future tense. This is Wikibooks material and Wikibooks already has a more extensive module on it. - Mgm|^(talk) 14:28, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Future tense because Simple future tense is ambiguous (other languages have simple future tenses). Andrew pmk | Talk 15:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. Per Andrew and Mgm. Simple future tense sounds like the same thing as future tense. Is there such thing as difficult future tense or complicated future tense. Don't think so. Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde 02:38, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are "compound future tenses" since you ask. Kappa 02:58, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to future tense. Let readers of future tense know about the wikibooks entry, too. --Jacquelyn Marie 03:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.