Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinhyeon station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sinhyeon station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wonjong station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.

Redirect to Seohae Line#Stations per WP:NTRAINSTATION and WP:GNG. Significa liberdade, perhaps these could have been a mass nomination, as they are all clearly mass created, with the same sources. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 06:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @JML1148 -- Is there a way to retroactively bundle them? Significa liberdade (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Significa liberdade: Not that I know of. It would be possible to withdraw all of the nominations and create a bundle, however as there are now !votes, especially some with more than one type of !vote, it would be impractical to do it now. It's not too much of an issue, just a question I had. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 07:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JML1148: Well, now I know. :) Significa liberdade (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea. Jumpytoo Talk 08:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect ALL to Seohae Line#Stations Djflem (talk) 11:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There was consensus to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station, so I don't think we can redirect all of these. Not a bundled nom, each should be treated separately for now. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redireсt~~ Keep per edits since nomination. Suitskvarts (talk) 12:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the strength of the three references present in the current version of the article as well as of the corresponding Korean article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The new references added are sufficient to meet WP:GNG. JaventheAldericky (talk) 20:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.