- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sinkha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
article does not assert notability, no secondary sources listed, perhaps it could be merged into a broader article? Not even sure if one exists. Napsterbater (talk) 04:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete— Does not appear to be notable. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 05:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it doesn't have enough context. Its lack of context suggested further that the subject isn't notable. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It has a few broad references but isn't that notable. As the previous contributor notes, the article is very small which suggests it will be nothing more than a stub. Artene50 (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.