Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters in Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 20:35, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters in Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Plantron (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep some non-trivial coverage in Malay papers and also the NYT http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/world/asia/26malaysia.html (was no search made before nomination?). Per http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/1/25/nation/20100125154150&sec=nation the group has published a previously banned book (https://shop.elsevier.com/authored_subject_sections/S06/S06.../art15.pdf) which itself appears notable. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Quite an important article and notable. scope_creep (talk) 22:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a very significant organisation in Malaysia.[1] Granted, the article needs some work. But this is a very lay-down case.--Mkativerata (talk) 00:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep! This organization makes headlines from time to time. What do you mean, not notable? Piff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.168.233 (talk) 07:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep How notable they actually are is obviously open for debate.--Utinomen (talk) 23:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.