Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiteFrame (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SiteFrame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:N and no significant third party reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 16x9 (talk) 20:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No notability beyond "it exists". Google does not indicate this is more or less important than any of the dozens of CMSs out there. And one of the refs is a hijacked parked ___domain page. §FreeRangeFrog 21:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 10:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - WP:CORP --  Chzz  ►  13:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. No independent notability and lack of independent sources. Note there are Keep arguments in the 1st AFD, but I don't find them compelling, especially 18 mos later. Martinp (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.