Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiteScreen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SiteScreen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability criteria. Can't find substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Citobun (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - subject has won significant awards, which is reliably sourced. Outside that, the rest of the page is unsourced. Meatsgains (talk) 17:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches clearly found nothing better and this has hardly changed since the first AfD when the only still active user Cullen328 commented and also when Deb tagged the article as such not long after the article started. With no better signs of better notability and improvement, there's no better article. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no objection to deletion at this time. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't remember it but it does read as blatant promotion. Deb (talk) 10:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.