Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skagerak and Nesbru Model United Nations
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Possible Vanity, also borders on repository of random information. WP:NOT. Most of the information exists already in Model United Nations. Mystache 02:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC). Edited: Mystache 03:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
merge _ Librarianofages 03:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC) edited: Librarianofages 03:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no assertion of notability. --Terence Ong 04:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Model United Nations per nom — who knows how many Model UN conferences worldwide are there? Kimchi.sg | talk 19:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appears to be verifiable, not a vanity page. For great justice. 22:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. --Eivindt@c 02:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - 80 to 120 high school students? -- Hirudo 02:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and don't bother to redirect - no sign of notability, most of the content is summarizing the general idea of a Model United Nations --Ajdz 05:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This should be on the group's own website, not Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.