- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 18:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No citations on this term. Checked various online search engines, haven't located a single hit on this term, aside from a username on various internet forums. Suspect original research, perhaps even a hoax? I can't verify it... -- Irixman (t) (m) 15:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It fails all sorts of rules and guidelines and ideas: Unverifiable, fails the Google test, perhaps a hoax, basically a slightly lengthy dicdef, perhaps vanity by User:Skahead17, who has never edited another article... the list could probably continue. -- Kicking222 18:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I like ska, but this article seems like OR. If the author thinks this is real, non-OR and verification (in the form of citations) need to be forthcoming soon. If the topic is real, there'll be no problem in finding Internet sources to back it up. Interlingua talk 02:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism and Original Reseach, doesn't even appear in the urban dictionary. Delete per WP:NEO and WP:OR. --TeaDrinker 17:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.