Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skull Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skull Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see anything that suggests that this organisation is in any way notable. TheLongTone (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete please by all means, as clear advertising for a noticeably new company with nothing at all for actual notability and substance since the information and sources themselves are trivial, and it's clear someone company-involved started it, that's all we need. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam on an business with no indications of notability or significance. This content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:Corp; not notable. Kierzek (talk) 17:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and promotional. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 05:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.