Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyscraper Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skyscraper Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails general notability guidelines, was previously deleted as PROD and recreated with no additional references; I cannot find any reliable sources. Was PROD again, but due to the recreation I'm bringing it here instead Chzz ► 18:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sounds like interesting freeware but there is no assertion of notability. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nonnotable. `R. S. Shaw (talk) 08:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax --3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 21:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 21:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete It is a real project and i fixed the page. Would you like me to add some photos?elevatorman138 21:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete' No assertion of notability, and no obvious evidence of notability.SPhilbrick T 18:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.