Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skywind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skywind

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable unreleased fan-made mod. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per WP:TOOSOON. There seems to be a bit of coverage out there, mainly gaming blogs (some considered WP:VGRSes, some not) saying "look here's a trailer this looks cool" - if there is substantially more coverage upon release (if it's ever officially released) it can be remade. ansh666 00:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I see your points; I don't really agree, but I won't stand in the way. ansh666 01:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, GNG is definitely met; for example, PCGamer alone has 8 articles. There's also coverage by Polygon, Kotaku, Joystiq, VG24/7, Game Rant, The Escapist and Forbes. Some of the sources actually have depth, and as for the shorter articles, their opinion towards the game can count as "reception" at the very least. Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 07:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note, the Kotaku article is a dead link. I did find one on Kotaku Australia on Google, but I can't be bothered at the moment to look for it again. ansh666 21:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I've fixed the link. Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 00:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Satellizer's source hunting. Most of the sources are considered reliable per discussions at WP:VG/S. Sergecross73 msg me 13:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Satellizer. This mod has gotten significant coverage from reliable sources. The majority of these sources are gaming sources, but it has also gotten some coverage by more mainstream media such as Forbes. A clean-up of this article is needed, but notability is not an issue. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.