Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slaughter in the Vatican

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Acather96 (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slaughter in the Vatican (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS; barely more than an unsourced stub, the trivial amount of content in here could be merged into the parent article (Exhorder) with barely a ripple. I think a straight delete is in order; failing that, a merge and delete (an unlikely search term to say the least), and failing that, a merge and redirect. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 18:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Album by a notable band with at least some significant coverage in reliable sources. A merge is a possibility but that can be discussed on the talk pages of the relevant articles.--Michig (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as an acceptable stub article, though it could use expansion with more reviews. Such reviews are available at Metal Observer (site apparently blocked by WP) and Ultimate Guitar for example. This album does have some notability, at least in the metal collector scene, due to unfortunate conspiracy theories about Pantera ripping it off. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.