Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleep-is-for-the-weak-a-thon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - brenneman ^{T}^{L} 05:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sleep-is-for-the-weak-a-thon

Self-promotion, non-notable, uses forum posts and random Wikipedia articles as its "sources". The "record-holder" has the same name as the editor who wrote this article. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 23:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading the talk page. Just because I happen to be the record holder doesn't mean it's all vanity and lies. In fact, try reading something properly before plastering 'baleet' over it. Not self promotion, the fact I am the record holder is merely that - a fact. Notability is ambiguous as a cause for deletion. Forum posts as sources: Locations of existing threads of the competition, and the current record post ___location? What's the problem there? 'Random' articles as sources: Try reading the article. I quote: 'Information and sources for the possible effects of partaking in this competition can be found on related articles'. Sleep deprivation being what the competition is about, for one. Sleep deprivation, insomnia, sleep debt for source on background info on effects of partaking. Precisely as I say. So there, arguments countered. I await your retort. EDY-innit 00:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NFT. -- Krash (Talk) 03:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up on an internet forum one day -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 10:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Krash. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.