- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- SlimBoat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously a PROD on the rationale "No evidence that this browser meets the notability guidelines." The PROD notice was removed and a download site link and online listing review were added. While there are other reviews available, such as this, in sum SlimBoat appears to fall short of the inclusion criteria at WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - insufficient coverage to establish notability. I did find [1]. -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There do appear a number of reviews, but it doesn't appear that they confer notability, only the existence of the browser, as per the first note in WP:NSOFT.--Pusillanimous (talk•contribs) 14:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.